From 1712c20dae7b770b62b2e3272100b3b40af0157c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 19:59:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] bad_inode_permission() is safe from RCU mode
return -EIO; is *not* a blocking operation, thank you very much.
Nick, what the hell have you been smoking?
Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
---
fs/bad_inode.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/bad_inode.c b/fs/bad_inode.c
index 9ad2369d9e35e..bfcb18feb1df3 100644
--- a/fs/bad_inode.c
+++ b/fs/bad_inode.c
@@ -231,9 +231,6 @@ static int bad_inode_readlink(struct dentry *dentry, char __user *buffer,
static int bad_inode_permission(struct inode *inode, int mask, unsigned int flags)
{
- if (flags & IPERM_FLAG_RCU)
- return -ECHILD;
-
return -EIO;
}
--
GitLab