From 5eb6f9ad96967be4e0da55521a253e11b534bd3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 23:22:49 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] PM / Documentation: Fix minor issue in freezing_of_tasks.txt

In a paragraph, "kernel thread" is mistakenly written as "kernel". Fix this by
adding thread after word "kernel".

Changes are shown in multiple lines, as they are realigned to 80 col width.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@st.com>
Acked-by: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
---
 Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt | 8 ++++----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
index 6ccb68f68da68..ebd7490ef1df8 100644
--- a/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
+++ b/Documentation/power/freezing-of-tasks.txt
@@ -120,10 +120,10 @@ So in practice, the 'at all' may become a 'why freeze kernel threads?' and
 freezing user threads I don't find really objectionable."
 
 Still, there are kernel threads that may want to be freezable.  For example, if
-a kernel that belongs to a device driver accesses the device directly, it in
-principle needs to know when the device is suspended, so that it doesn't try to
-access it at that time.  However, if the kernel thread is freezable, it will be
-frozen before the driver's .suspend() callback is executed and it will be
+a kernel thread that belongs to a device driver accesses the device directly, it
+in principle needs to know when the device is suspended, so that it doesn't try
+to access it at that time.  However, if the kernel thread is freezable, it will
+be frozen before the driver's .suspend() callback is executed and it will be
 thawed after the driver's .resume() callback has run, so it won't be accessing
 the device while it's suspended.
 
-- 
GitLab