From 7f0c020ab6ecb513394de9b02df33a5cfc62084f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 2 Jan 2015 12:34:32 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: get rid of 'tpolicy' from __cpufreq_add_dev()
There is no need of this separate variable, use 'policy' instead.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 1e72621ca157e..127cc6f18ca51 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -1105,7 +1105,7 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
{
unsigned int j, cpu = dev->id;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
- struct cpufreq_policy *policy, *tpolicy;
+ struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
unsigned long flags;
bool recover_policy = cpufreq_suspended;
@@ -1127,10 +1127,10 @@ static int __cpufreq_add_dev(struct device *dev, struct subsys_interface *sif)
/* Check if this cpu was hot-unplugged earlier and has siblings */
read_lock_irqsave(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- list_for_each_entry(tpolicy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
- if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, tpolicy->related_cpus)) {
+ list_for_each_entry(policy, &cpufreq_policy_list, policy_list) {
+ if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, policy->related_cpus)) {
read_unlock_irqrestore(&cpufreq_driver_lock, flags);
- ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(tpolicy, cpu, dev);
+ ret = cpufreq_add_policy_cpu(policy, cpu, dev);
up_read(&cpufreq_rwsem);
return ret;
}
--
GitLab