From bf17455b9cbd4b10bf30d39c047307e1d774fb1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
Date: Wed, 25 May 2022 10:32:22 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] fscache: Fix if condition in
fscache_wait_on_volume_collision()
After waiting for the volume to complete the acquisition with timeout,
the if condition under which potential volume collision occurs should be
acquire the volume is still pending rather than not pending so that we
will continue to wait until the pending flag is cleared. Also, use the
existing test pending wrapper directly instead of test_bit().
Fixes: 62ab63352350 ("fscache: Implement volume registration")
Signed-off-by: Yue Hu <huyue2@coolpad.com>
Signed-off-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Gao Xiang <hsiangkao@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffle Xu <jefflexu@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
Link: https://listman.redhat.com/archives/linux-cachefs/2022-May/006918.html
---
fs/fscache/volume.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fscache/volume.c b/fs/fscache/volume.c
index f2aa7dbad7667..a058e0136bfeb 100644
--- a/fs/fscache/volume.c
+++ b/fs/fscache/volume.c
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@ static void fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(struct fscache_volume *candidate,
{
wait_var_event_timeout(&candidate->flags,
!fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate), 20 * HZ);
- if (!fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
+ if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate)) {
pr_notice("Potential volume collision new=%08x old=%08x",
candidate->debug_id, collidee_debug_id);
fscache_stat(&fscache_n_volumes_collision);
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@ static bool fscache_hash_volume(struct fscache_volume *candidate)
hlist_bl_add_head(&candidate->hash_link, h);
hlist_bl_unlock(h);
- if (test_bit(FSCACHE_VOLUME_ACQUIRE_PENDING, &candidate->flags))
+ if (fscache_is_acquire_pending(candidate))
fscache_wait_on_volume_collision(candidate, collidee_debug_id);
return true;
--
GitLab