From d40610da1904e642766454a05d09a30ae063cecb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2024 11:43:03 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] btrfs: convert BUG_ON in btrfs_reloc_cow_block() to proper
error handling
[ Upstream commit 6a4730b325aaa48f7a5d5ba97aff0a955e2d9cec ]
This BUG_ON is meant to catch backref cache problems, but these can
arise from either bugs in the backref cache or corruption in the extent
tree. Fix it to be a proper error.
Reviewed-by: Boris Burkov <boris@bur.io>
Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
---
fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
index 4c6ba97299cd6..d6cda0b2e9256 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c
@@ -4423,8 +4423,18 @@ int btrfs_reloc_cow_block(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans,
WARN_ON(!first_cow && level == 0);
node = rc->backref_cache.path[level];
- BUG_ON(node->bytenr != buf->start &&
- node->new_bytenr != buf->start);
+
+ /*
+ * If node->bytenr != buf->start and node->new_bytenr !=
+ * buf->start then we've got the wrong backref node for what we
+ * expected to see here and the cache is incorrect.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(node->bytenr != buf->start && node->new_bytenr != buf->start)) {
+ btrfs_err(fs_info,
+"bytenr %llu was found but our backref cache was expecting %llu or %llu",
+ buf->start, node->bytenr, node->new_bytenr);
+ return -EUCLEAN;
+ }
btrfs_backref_drop_node_buffer(node);
atomic_inc(&cow->refs);
--
GitLab