Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Commit 39243840 authored by Nick Spence's avatar Nick Spence Committed by Wolfgang Denk
Browse files

mpc86xx: use r4 instead of r2 in lock_ram_in_cache and unlock_ram_in_cache


This is needed in unlock_ram_in_cache() because it is called from C and
will corrupt the small data area anchor that is kept in R2.

lock_ram_in_cache() is modified similarly as good coding practice, but
is not called from C.

Signed-off-by: default avatarNick Spence <nick.spence@freescale.com>
parent 5c7cbcd3
No related branches found
No related tags found
No related merge requests found
......@@ -895,9 +895,9 @@ lock_ram_in_cache:
*/
lis r3, (CFG_INIT_RAM_ADDR & ~31)@h
ori r3, r3, (CFG_INIT_RAM_ADDR & ~31)@l
li r2, ((CFG_INIT_RAM_END & ~31) + \
li r4, ((CFG_INIT_RAM_END & ~31) + \
(CFG_INIT_RAM_ADDR & 31) + 31) / 32
mtctr r2
mtctr r4
1:
dcbz r0, r3
addi r3, r3, 32
......@@ -930,9 +930,9 @@ unlock_ram_in_cache:
/* invalidate the INIT_RAM section */
lis r3, (CFG_INIT_RAM_ADDR & ~31)@h
ori r3, r3, (CFG_INIT_RAM_ADDR & ~31)@l
li r2, ((CFG_INIT_RAM_END & ~31) + \
li r4, ((CFG_INIT_RAM_END & ~31) + \
(CFG_INIT_RAM_ADDR & 31) + 31) / 32
mtctr r2
mtctr r4
1: icbi r0, r3
addi r3, r3, 32
bdnz 1b
......
0% Loading or .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
Finish editing this message first!
Please register or to comment