Something went wrong on our end
-
Peter Zijlstra authored
Sean noted that ever since commit 152e11f6 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") KVM's preemption notifiers have started mis-classifying preemption vs blocking. Notably p->on_rq is no longer sufficient to determine if a task is runnable or blocked -- the aforementioned commit introduces tasks that remain on the runqueue even through they will not run again, and should be considered blocked for many cases. Add the task_is_runnable() helper to classify things and audit all external users of the p->on_rq state. Also add a few comments. Fixes: 152e11f6 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") Reported-by:
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> Tested-by:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Signed-off-by:
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241010091843.GK33184@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net
Peter Zijlstra authoredSean noted that ever since commit 152e11f6 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") KVM's preemption notifiers have started mis-classifying preemption vs blocking. Notably p->on_rq is no longer sufficient to determine if a task is runnable or blocked -- the aforementioned commit introduces tasks that remain on the runqueue even through they will not run again, and should be considered blocked for many cases. Add the task_is_runnable() helper to classify things and audit all external users of the p->on_rq state. Also add a few comments. Fixes: 152e11f6 ("sched/fair: Implement delayed dequeue") Reported-by:
