Something went wrong on our end
-
commit 4dc48c88fcf82b89fdebd83a906aaa64f40fb8a9 upstream. For devm_phy_destroy(), its comment says it needs to invoke phy_destroy() to destroy the phy, but it will not actually invoke the function since devres_destroy() does not call devm_phy_consume(), and the missing phy_destroy() call will cause that the phy fails to be destroyed. Fortunately, the faulty API has not been used by current kernel tree. Fix by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within the API. Fixes: ff764963 ("drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework") Reviewed-by:
Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Zijun Hu <quic_zijuhu@quicinc.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20241213-phy_core_fix-v6-3-40ae28f5015a@quicinc.com Signed-off-by:
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 4dc48c88fcf82b89fdebd83a906aaa64f40fb8a9 upstream. For devm_phy_destroy(), its comment says it needs to invoke phy_destroy() to destroy the phy, but it will not actually invoke the function since devres_destroy() does not call devm_phy_consume(), and the missing phy_destroy() call will cause that the phy fails to be destroyed. Fortunately, the faulty API has not been used by current kernel tree. Fix by using devres_release() instead of devres_destroy() within the API. Fixes: ff764963 ("drivers: phy: add generic PHY framework") Reviewed-by:
phy-core.c 27.63 KiB