Something went wrong on our end
-
Eric Dumazet authored
drop_monitor is using an unique list on which all netdevices in the host have an element, regardless of their netns. This scales poorly, not only at device unregister time (what I caught during my netns dismantle stress tests), but also at packet processing time whenever trace_napi_poll_hit() is called. If the intent was to avoid adding one pointer in 'struct net_device' then surely we prefer O(1) behavior. Signed-off-by:
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Eric Dumazet authoreddrop_monitor is using an unique list on which all netdevices in the host have an element, regardless of their netns. This scales poorly, not only at device unregister time (what I caught during my netns dismantle stress tests), but also at packet processing time whenever trace_napi_poll_hit() is called. If the intent was to avoid adding one pointer in 'struct net_device' then surely we prefer O(1) behavior. Signed-off-by:
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@tuxdriver.com> Signed-off-by:
David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>