Something went wrong on our end
-
Anna-Maria Gleixner authored
There are in-tree users of atomic_dec_and_lock() which must acquire the spin lock with interrupts disabled. To workaround the lack of an irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock() they use local_irq_save() at the call site. This causes extra code and creates in some places unneeded long interrupt disabled times. These places need also extra treatment for PREEMPT_RT due to the disconnect of the irq disabling and the lock function. Implement the missing irqsave variant of the function. Signed-off-by:
Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de> Signed-off-by:
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Acked-by:
Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r20180612161621.22645-3-bigeasy@linutronix.de
Anna-Maria Gleixner authoredThere are in-tree users of atomic_dec_and_lock() which must acquire the spin lock with interrupts disabled. To workaround the lack of an irqsave variant of atomic_dec_and_lock() they use local_irq_save() at the call site. This causes extra code and creates in some places unneeded long interrupt disabled times. These places need also extra treatment for PREEMPT_RT due to the disconnect of the irq disabling and the lock function. Implement the missing irqsave variant of the function. Signed-off-by:
dec_and_lock.c 1.23 KiB