Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects
Select Git revision
  • feature/v6.1-ktn/add-st1633-touch-imx8mm
  • v6.12-ktn
  • v6.1-ktn default protected
  • v5.10-ktn protected
  • v5.4-ktn protected
  • feature/v6.12-ktn/mx8mp-osm-s-uart4-pinmux-fix
  • ci/upstream-sync
  • v6.10-ktn
  • feature/v6.1-ktn/ksz-switch-backports
  • feature/v6.9-ktn/mx93-dev-lvds
  • feature/v6.1-ktn/kontron-mx8m-osm-improvements
  • v4.14-ktn protected
  • feature/master/upstream-spinand-rx-delay
  • feature/next/upstream-imx8mm-dts-sync
  • feature/fix-w25n02kv-clk-to-rx-delay
  • develop-v5.10-stm32mp-ktn
  • feature/v6.1-ktn/mx8mp-hdmi-patch-sync
  • feature/v6.5/mx8mp-support
  • feature/v5.10-ktn/rtc-bsm-fix
  • v5.10-ktn-remoteproc-rpmsg-backport-5.19-rc5
  • v5.15.37
  • st-alpha
22 results
Search by author
  • Any Author
  • Alexander Arndt Alexander Arndt aarndt
  • Andreas Findeklee Andreas Findeklee afindeklee
  • Annette Kobou Annette Kobou akobou
  • Armin Mück Armin Mück amueck
  • **** **** project_143_bot_c8bbc40375b18788e4765d3c396612d5
  • Daniel Ehrler Daniel Ehrler dehrler
  • Devran Ölcer Devran Ölcer doelcer
  • Dieter Scheufele Dieter Scheufele dscheufele
  • Dietmar Kolbus Dietmar Kolbus dkolbus
  • Dominik Wurster Dominik Wurster Wurster
  • Eberhard Stoll Eberhard Stoll estoll
  • Florian Mayer Florian Mayer fmayer
  • Frieder Schrempf Frieder Schrempf fschrempf
  • Julian Bauknecht Julian Bauknecht jbauknecht
  • Jó Bitsch Jó Bitsch jbitsch
  • Jürgen Kling Jürgen Kling jgkling
  • Klemenz Christof Klemenz Christof kchristof
  • Lukas Loosli Lukas Loosli lloosli
  • Marc Gonser Marc Gonser mgonser
  • Markus Abegg Markus Abegg mabegg
20 authors
  1. Apr 07, 2020
  3. Apr 03, 2020
  5. Apr 02, 2020
    • Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar
      mm/compaction: Disable compact_unevictable_allowed on RT · 6923aa0d
      Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored 
      Since commit 5bbe3547 ("mm: allow compaction of unevictable pages")
it is allowed to examine mlocked pages and compact them by default.  On
-RT even minor pagefaults are problematic because it may take a few 100us
to resolve them and until then the task is blocked.

Make compact_unevictable_allowed = 0 default and issue a warning on RT if
it is changed.

[bigeasy@linutronix.de: v5]
  Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190710144138.qyn4tuttdq6h7kqx@linutronix.de/
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200319165536.ovi75tsr2seared4@linutronix.de


Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: default avatarMel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Acked-by: default avatarVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20190710144138.qyn4tuttdq6h7kqx@linutronix.de/
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200303202225.nhqc3v5gwlb7x6et@linutronix.de


Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      6923aa0d
    • Sebastian Andrzej Siewior's avatar
      mm/compaction: really limit compact_unevictable_allowed to 0 and 1 · 964b692d
      Sebastian Andrzej Siewior authored 
      
The proc file `compact_unevictable_allowed' should allow 0 and 1 only, the
`extra*' attribues have been set properly but without
proc_dointvec_minmax() as the `proc_handler' the limit will not be
enforced.

Use proc_dointvec_minmax() as the `proc_handler' to enfoce the valid
specified range.

Signed-off-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: default avatarVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200303202054.gsosv7fsx2ma3cic@linutronix.de


Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      964b692d
    • Johannes Weiner's avatar
      mm: memcontrol: recursive memory.low protection · 8a931f80
      Johannes Weiner authored 
      
Right now, the effective protection of any given cgroup is capped by its
own explicit memory.low setting, regardless of what the parent says.  The
reasons for this are mostly historical and ease of implementation: to make
delegation of memory.low safe, effective protection is the min() of all
memory.low up the tree.

Unfortunately, this limitation makes it impossible to protect an entire
subtree from another without forcing the user to make explicit protection
allocations all the way to the leaf cgroups - something that is highly
undesirable in real life scenarios.

Consider memory in a data center host.  At the cgroup top level, we have a
distinction between system management software and the actual workload the
system is executing.  Both branches are further subdivided into individual
services, job components etc.

We want to protect the workload as a whole from the system management
software, but that doesn't mean we want to protect and prioritize
individual workload wrt each other.  Their memory demand can vary over
time, and we'd want the VM to simply cache the hottest data within the
workload subtree.  Yet, the current memory.low limitations force us to
allocate a fixed amount of protection to each workload component in order
to get protection from system management software in general.  This
results in very inefficient resource distribution.

Another concern with mandating downward allocation is that, as the
complexity of the cgroup tree grows, it gets harder for the lower levels
to be informed about decisions made at the host-level.  Consider a
container inside a namespace that in turn creates its own nested tree of
cgroups to run multiple workloads.  It'd be extremely difficult to
configure memory.low parameters in those leaf cgroups that on one hand
balance pressure among siblings as the container desires, while also
reflecting the host-level protection from e.g.  rpm upgrades, that lie
beyond one or more delegation and namespacing points in the tree.

It's highly unusual from a cgroup interface POV that nested levels have to
be aware of and reflect decisions made at higher levels for them to be
effective.

To enable such use cases and scale configurability for complex trees, this
patch implements a resource inheritance model for memory that is similar
to how the CPU and the IO controller implement work-conserving resource
allocations: a share of a resource allocated to a subree always applies to
the entire subtree recursively, while allowing, but not mandating,
children to further specify distribution rules.

That means that if protection is explicitly allocated among siblings,
those configured shares are being followed during page reclaim just like
they are now.  However, if the memory.low set at a higher level is not
fully claimed by the children in that subtree, the "floating" remainder is
applied to each cgroup in the tree in proportion to its size.  Since
reclaim pressure is applied in proportion to size as well, each child in
that tree gets the same boost, and the effect is neutral among siblings -
with respect to each other, they behave as if no memory control was
enabled at all, and the VM simply balances the memory demands optimally
within the subtree.  But collectively those cgroups enjoy a boost over the
cgroups in neighboring trees.

E.g.  a leaf cgroup with a memory.low setting of 0 no longer means that
it's not getting a share of the hierarchically assigned resource, just
that it doesn't claim a fixed amount of it to protect from its siblings.

This allows us to recursively protect one subtree (workload) from another
(system management), while letting subgroups compete freely among each
other - without having to assign fixed shares to each leaf, and without
nested groups having to echo higher-level settings.

The floating protection composes naturally with fixed protection.
Consider the following example tree:

		A            A: low = 2G
               / \          A1: low = 1G
              A1 A2         A2: low = 0G

As outside pressure is applied to this tree, A1 will enjoy a fixed
protection from A2 of 1G, but the remaining, unclaimed 1G from A is split
evenly among A1 and A2, coming out to 1.5G and 0.5G.

There is a slight risk of regressing theoretical setups where the
top-level cgroups don't know about the true budgeting and set bogusly high
"bypass" values that are meaningfully allocated down the tree.  Such
setups would rely on unclaimed protection to be discarded, and
distributing it would change the intended behavior.  Be safe and hide the
new behavior behind a mount option, 'memory_recursiveprot'.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Acked-by: default avatarTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Acked-by: default avatarChris Down <chris@chrisdown.name>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@suse.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200227195606.46212-4-hannes@cmpxchg.org


Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8a931f80
    • Roman Gushchin's avatar
      mm: kmem: rename memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page() · f4b00eab
      Roman Gushchin authored 
      
Rename (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge() into (__)memcg_kmem_(un)charge_page()
to better reflect what they are actually doing:

1) call __memcg_kmem_(un)charge_memcg() to actually charge or uncharge
   the current memcg

2) set or clear the PageKmemcg flag

Signed-off-by: default avatarRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarShakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: default avatarJohannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>
Cc: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov.dev@gmail.com>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200109202659.752357-4-guro@fb.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      f4b00eab
    • Chen Yu's avatar
      PM: sleep: Add pm_debug_messages kernel command line option · db96a759
      Chen Yu authored 
      
Debug messages from the system suspend/hibernation infrastructure
are disabled by default, and can only be enabled after the system
has boot up via /sys/power/pm_debug_messages.

This makes the hibernation resume hard to track as it involves system
boot up across hibernation.  There's no chance for software_resume()
to track the resume process, for example.

Add a kernel command line option to set pm_debug_messages during
boot up.

Signed-off-by: default avatarChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
[ rjw: Subject & changelog ]
Signed-off-by: default avatarRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
      db96a759
  7. Apr 01, 2020
  9. Mar 31, 2020
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      bpf: Implement bpf_prog replacement for an active bpf_cgroup_link · 0c991ebc
      Andrii Nakryiko authored 
      
Add new operation (LINK_UPDATE), which allows to replace active bpf_prog from
under given bpf_link. Currently this is only supported for bpf_cgroup_link,
but will be extended to other kinds of bpf_links in follow-up patches.

For bpf_cgroup_link, implemented functionality matches existing semantics for
direct bpf_prog attachment (including BPF_F_REPLACE flag). User can either
unconditionally set new bpf_prog regardless of which bpf_prog is currently
active under given bpf_link, or, optionally, can specify expected active
bpf_prog. If active bpf_prog doesn't match expected one, no changes are
performed, old bpf_link stays intact and attached, operation returns
a failure.

cgroup_bpf_replace() operation is resolving race between auto-detachment and
bpf_prog update in the same fashion as it's done for bpf_link detachment,
except in this case update has no way of succeeding because of target cgroup
marked as dying. So in this case error is returned.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330030001.2312810-3-andriin@fb.com
      0c991ebc
    • Andrii Nakryiko's avatar
      bpf: Implement bpf_link-based cgroup BPF program attachment · af6eea57
      Andrii Nakryiko authored 
      
Implement new sub-command to attach cgroup BPF programs and return FD-based
bpf_link back on success. bpf_link, once attached to cgroup, cannot be
replaced, except by owner having its FD. Cgroup bpf_link supports only
BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI semantics. Both link-based and prog-based BPF_F_ALLOW_MULTI
attachments can be freely intermixed.

To prevent bpf_cgroup_link from keeping cgroup alive past the point when no
BPF program can be executed, implement auto-detachment of link. When
cgroup_bpf_release() is called, all attached bpf_links are forced to release
cgroup refcounts, but they leave bpf_link otherwise active and allocated, as
well as still owning underlying bpf_prog. This is because user-space might
still have FDs open and active, so bpf_link as a user-referenced object can't
be freed yet. Once last active FD is closed, bpf_link will be freed and
underlying bpf_prog refcount will be dropped. But cgroup refcount won't be
touched, because cgroup is released already.

The inherent race between bpf_cgroup_link release (from closing last FD) and
cgroup_bpf_release() is resolved by both operations taking cgroup_mutex. So
the only additional check required is when bpf_cgroup_link attempts to detach
itself from cgroup. At that time we need to check whether there is still
cgroup associated with that link. And if not, exit with success, because
bpf_cgroup_link was already successfully detached.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Acked-by: default avatarRoman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330030001.2312810-2-andriin@fb.com
      af6eea57
  11. Mar 30, 2020
    • John Fastabend's avatar
      bpf: Verifier, refine 32bit bound in do_refine_retval_range · fa123ac0
      John Fastabend authored 
      
Further refine return values range in do_refine_retval_range by noting
these are int return types (We will assume here that int is a 32-bit type).

Two reasons to pull this out of original patch. First it makes the original
fix impossible to backport. And second I've not seen this as being problematic
in practice unlike the other case.

Fixes: 849fa506 ("bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560421952.10843.12496354931526965046.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
      fa123ac0
    • John Fastabend's avatar
      bpf: Verifier, do explicit ALU32 bounds tracking · 3f50f132
      John Fastabend authored 
      
It is not possible for the current verifier to track ALU32 and JMP ops
correctly. This can result in the verifier aborting with errors even though
the program should be verifiable. BPF codes that hit this can work around
it by changin int variables to 64-bit types, marking variables volatile,
etc. But this is all very ugly so it would be better to avoid these tricks.

But, the main reason to address this now is do_refine_retval_range() was
assuming return values could not be negative. Once we fixed this code that
was previously working will no longer work. See do_refine_retval_range()
patch for details. And we don't want to suddenly cause programs that used
to work to fail.

The simplest example code snippet that illustrates the problem is likely
this,

 53: w8 = w0                    // r8 <- [0, S32_MAX],
                                // w8 <- [-S32_MIN, X]
 54: w8 <s 0                    // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX]
                                // w8 <- [0, X]

The expected 64-bit and 32-bit bounds after each line are shown on the
right. The current issue is without the w* bounds we are forced to use
the worst case bound of [0, U32_MAX]. To resolve this type of case,
jmp32 creating divergent 32-bit bounds from 64-bit bounds, we add explicit
32-bit register bounds s32_{min|max}_value and u32_{min|max}_value. Then
from branch_taken logic creating new bounds we can track 32-bit bounds
explicitly.

The next case we observed is ALU ops after the jmp32,

 53: w8 = w0                    // r8 <- [0, S32_MAX],
                                // w8 <- [-S32_MIN, X]
 54: w8 <s 0                    // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX]
                                // w8 <- [0, X]
 55: w8 += 1                    // r8 <- [0, U32_MAX+1]
                                // w8 <- [0, X+1]

In order to keep the bounds accurate at this point we also need to track
ALU32 ops. To do this we add explicit ALU32 logic for each of the ALU
ops, mov, add, sub, etc.

Finally there is a question of how and when to merge bounds. The cases
enumerate here,

1. MOV ALU32   - zext 32-bit -> 64-bit
2. MOV ALU64   - copy 64-bit -> 32-bit
3. op  ALU32   - zext 32-bit -> 64-bit
4. op  ALU64   - n/a
5. jmp ALU32   - 64-bit: var32_off | upper_32_bits(var64_off)
6. jmp ALU64   - 32-bit: (>> (<< var64_off))

Details for each case,

For "MOV ALU32" BPF arch zero extends so we simply copy the bounds
from 32-bit into 64-bit ensuring we truncate var_off and 64-bit
bounds correctly. See zext_32_to_64.

For "MOV ALU64" copy all bounds including 32-bit into new register. If
the src register had 32-bit bounds the dst register will as well.

For "op ALU32" zero extend 32-bit into 64-bit the same as move,
see zext_32_to_64.

For "op ALU64" calculate both 32-bit and 64-bit bounds no merging
is done here. Except we have a special case. When RSH or ARSH is
done we can't simply ignore shifting bits from 64-bit reg into the
32-bit subreg. So currently just push bounds from 64-bit into 32-bit.
This will be correct in the sense that they will represent a valid
state of the register. However we could lose some accuracy if an
ARSH is following a jmp32 operation. We can handle this special
case in a follow up series.

For "jmp ALU32" mark 64-bit reg unknown and recalculate 64-bit bounds
from tnum by setting var_off to ((<<(>>var_off)) | var32_off). We
special case if 64-bit bounds has zero'd upper 32bits at which point
we can simply copy 32-bit bounds into 64-bit register. This catches
a common compiler trick where upper 32-bits are zeroed and then
32-bit ops are used followed by a 64-bit compare or 64-bit op on
a pointer. See __reg_combine_64_into_32().

For "jmp ALU64" cast the bounds of the 64bit to their 32-bit
counterpart. For example s32_min_value = (s32)reg->smin_value. For
tnum use only the lower 32bits via, (>>(<<var_off)). See
__reg_combine_64_into_32().

Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560419880.10843.11448220440809118343.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
      3f50f132
    • John Fastabend's avatar
      bpf: Verifier, do_refine_retval_range may clamp umin to 0 incorrectly · 10060503
      John Fastabend authored 
      
do_refine_retval_range() is called to refine return values from specified
helpers, probe_read_str and get_stack at the moment, the reasoning is
because both have a max value as part of their input arguments and
because the helper ensure the return value will not be larger than this
we can set smax values of the return register, r0.

However, the return value is a signed integer so setting umax is incorrect
It leads to further confusion when the do_refine_retval_range() then calls,
__reg_deduce_bounds() which will see a umax value as meaning the value is
unsigned and then assuming it is unsigned set the smin = umin which in this
case results in 'smin = 0' and an 'smax = X' where X is the input argument
from the helper call.

Here are the comments from _reg_deduce_bounds() on why this would be safe
to do.

 /* Learn sign from unsigned bounds.  Signed bounds cross the sign
  * boundary, so we must be careful.
  */
 if ((s64)reg->umax_value >= 0) {
	/* Positive.  We can't learn anything from the smin, but smax
	 * is positive, hence safe.
	 */
	reg->smin_value = reg->umin_value;
	reg->smax_value = reg->umax_value = min_t(u64, reg->smax_value,
						  reg->umax_value);

But now we incorrectly have a return value with type int with the
signed bounds (0,X). Suppose the return value is negative, which is
possible the we have the verifier and reality out of sync. Among other
things this may result in any error handling code being falsely detected
as dead-code and removed. For instance the example below shows using
bpf_probe_read_str() causes the error path to be identified as dead
code and removed.

>From the 'llvm-object -S' dump,

 r2 = 100
 call 45
 if r0 s< 0 goto +4
 r4 = *(u32 *)(r7 + 0)

But from dump xlate

  (b7) r2 = 100
  (85) call bpf_probe_read_compat_str#-96768
  (61) r4 = *(u32 *)(r7 +0)  <-- dropped if goto

Due to verifier state after call being

 R0=inv(id=0,umax_value=100,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f))

To fix omit setting the umax value because its not safe. The only
actual bounds we know is the smax. This results in the correct bounds
(SMIN, X) where X is the max length from the helper. After this the
new verifier state looks like the following after call 45.

R0=inv(id=0,smax_value=100)

Then xlated version no longer removed dead code giving the expected
result,

  (b7) r2 = 100
  (85) call bpf_probe_read_compat_str#-96768
  (c5) if r0 s< 0x0 goto pc+4
  (61) r4 = *(u32 *)(r7 +0)

Note, bpf_probe_read_* calls are root only so we wont hit this case
with non-root bpf users.

v3: comment had some documentation about meta set to null case which
is not relevant here and confusing to include in the comment.

v2 note: In original version we set msize_smax_value from check_func_arg()
and propagated this into smax of retval. The logic was smax is the bound
on the retval we set and because the type in the helper is ARG_CONST_SIZE
we know that the reg is a positive tnum_const() so umax=smax. Alexei
pointed out though this is a bit odd to read because the register in
check_func_arg() has a C type of u32 and the umax bound would be the
normally relavent bound here. Pulling in extra knowledge about future
checks makes reading the code a bit tricky. Further having a signed
meta data that can only ever be positive is also a bit odd. So dropped
the msize_smax_value metadata and made it a u64 msize_max_value to
indicate its unsigned. And additionally save bound from umax value in
check_arg_funcs which is the same as smax due to as noted above tnumx_cont
and negative check but reads better. By my analysis nothing functionally
changes in v2 but it does get easier to read so that is win.

Fixes: 849fa506 ("bpf/verifier: refine retval R0 state for bpf_get_stack helper")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158560417900.10843.14351995140624628941.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower
      10060503
    • KP Singh's avatar
      bpf: btf: Fix arg verification in btf_ctx_access() · f50b49a0
      KP Singh authored 
      
The bounds checking for the arguments accessed in the BPF program breaks
when the expected_attach_type is not BPF_TRACE_FEXIT, BPF_LSM_MAC or
BPF_MODIFY_RETURN resulting in no check being done for the default case
(the programs which do not receive the return value of the attached
function in its arguments) when the index of the argument being accessed
is equal to the number of arguments (nr_args).

This was a result of a misplaced "else if" block  introduced by the
Commit 6ba43b76 ("bpf: Attachment verification for
BPF_MODIFY_RETURN")

Fixes: 6ba43b76 ("bpf: Attachment verification for BPF_MODIFY_RETURN")
Reported-by: default avatarJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarKP Singh <kpsingh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330144246.338-1-kpsingh@chromium.org
      f50b49a0
    • Jann Horn's avatar
      bpf: Simplify reg_set_min_max_inv handling · 0fc31b10
      Jann Horn authored 
      
reg_set_min_max_inv() contains exactly the same logic as reg_set_min_max(),
just flipped around. While this makes sense in a cBPF verifier (where ALU
operations are not symmetric), it does not make sense for eBPF.

Replace reg_set_min_max_inv() with a helper that flips the opcode around,
then lets reg_set_min_max() do the complicated work.

Signed-off-by: default avatarJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330160324.15259-4-daniel@iogearbox.net
      0fc31b10
    • Jann Horn's avatar
      bpf: Fix tnum constraints for 32-bit comparisons · 604dca5e
      Jann Horn authored 
      
The BPF verifier tried to track values based on 32-bit comparisons by
(ab)using the tnum state via 581738a6 ("bpf: Provide better register
bounds after jmp32 instructions"). The idea is that after a check like
this:

    if ((u32)r0 > 3)
      exit

We can't meaningfully constrain the arithmetic-range-based tracking, but
we can update the tnum state to (value=0,mask=0xffff'ffff'0000'0003).
However, the implementation from 581738a6 didn't compute the tnum
constraint based on the fixed operand, but instead derives it from the
arithmetic-range-based tracking. This means that after the following
sequence of operations:

    if (r0 >= 0x1'0000'0001)
      exit
    if ((u32)r0 > 7)
      exit

The verifier assumed that the lower half of r0 is in the range (0, 0)
and apply the tnum constraint (value=0,mask=0xffff'ffff'0000'0000) thus
causing the overall tnum to be (value=0,mask=0x1'0000'0000), which was
incorrect. Provide a fixed implementation.

Fixes: 581738a6 ("bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32 instructions")
Signed-off-by: default avatarJann Horn <jannh@google.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330160324.15259-3-daniel@iogearbox.net
      604dca5e
    • Daniel Borkmann's avatar
      bpf: Undo incorrect __reg_bound_offset32 handling · f2d67fec
      Daniel Borkmann authored 
      Anatoly has been fuzzing with kBdysch harness and reported a hang in
one of the outcomes:

  0: (b7) r0 = 808464432
  1: (7f) r0 >>= r0
  2: (14) w0 -= 808464432
  3: (07) r0 += 808464432
  4: (b7) r1 = 808464432
  5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
   R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x30303020;0x10000001f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
  7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
  8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
   R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=271581184,umax_value=271581311,var_off=(0x10300000;0x7f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  9: (76) if w0 s>= 0x303030 goto pc+2
  12: (95) exit

  from 8 to 9: safe

  from 5 to 6: R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x30303020;0x10000001f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
  7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
  8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
   R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=271581184,umax_value=271581311,var_off=(0x10300000;0x7f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  9: safe

  from 8 to 9: safe
  verification time 589 usec
  stack depth 0
  processed 17 insns (limit 1000000) [...]

The underlying program was xlated as follows:

  # bpftool p d x i 9
   0: (b7) r0 = 808464432
   1: (7f) r0 >>= r0
   2: (14) w0 -= 808464432
   3: (07) r0 += 808464432
   4: (b7) r1 = 808464432
   5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
   6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
   7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
   8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
   9: (76) if w0 s>= 0x303030 goto pc+2
  10: (05) goto pc-1
  11: (05) goto pc-1
  12: (95) exit

The verifier rewrote original instructions it recognized as dead code with
'goto pc-1', but reality differs from verifier simulation in that we're
actually able to trigger a hang due to hitting the 'goto pc-1' instructions.

Taking different examples to make the issue more obvious: in this example
we're probing bounds on a completely unknown scalar variable in r1:

  [...]
  5: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R10=fp0
  5: (18) r2 = 0x4000000000
  7: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R10=fp0
  7: (18) r3 = 0x2000000000
  9: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R10=fp0
  9: (18) r4 = 0x400
  11: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R10=fp0
  11: (18) r5 = 0x200
  13: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
  13: (2d) if r1 > r2 goto pc+4
   R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
  14: R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
  14: (ad) if r1 < r3 goto pc+3
   R0_w=inv1 R1_w=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2_w=inv274877906944 R3_w=inv137438953472 R4_w=inv1024 R5_w=inv512 R10=fp0
  15: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7fffffffff)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
  15: (2e) if w1 > w4 goto pc+2
   R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f00000000)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
  16: R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f00000000)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
  16: (ae) if w1 < w5 goto pc+1
   R0=inv1 R1=inv(id=0,umin_value=137438953472,umax_value=274877906944,var_off=(0x0; 0x7f00000000)) R2=inv274877906944 R3=inv137438953472 R4=inv1024 R5=inv512 R10=fp0
  [...]

We're first probing lower/upper bounds via jmp64, later we do a similar
check via jmp32 and examine the resulting var_off there. After fall-through
in insn 14, we get the following bounded r1 with 0x7fffffffff unknown marked
bits in the variable section.

Thus, after knowing r1 <= 0x4000000000 and r1 >= 0x2000000000:

  max: 0b100000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x4000000000
  var: 0b111111111111111111111111111111111111111 / 0x7fffffffff
  min: 0b010000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x2000000000

Now, in insn 15 and 16, we perform a similar probe with lower/upper bounds
in jmp32.

Thus, after knowing r1 <= 0x4000000000 and r1 >= 0x2000000000 and
                    w1 <= 0x400        and w1 >= 0x200:

  max: 0b100000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x4000000000
  var: 0b111111100000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x7f00000000
  min: 0b010000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x2000000000

The lower/upper bounds haven't changed since they have high bits set in
u64 space and the jmp32 tests can only refine bounds in the low bits.

However, for the var part the expectation would have been 0x7f000007ff
or something less precise up to 0x7fffffffff. A outcome of 0x7f00000000
is not correct since it would contradict the earlier probed bounds
where we know that the result should have been in [0x200,0x400] in u32
space. Therefore, tests with such info will lead to wrong verifier
assumptions later on like falsely predicting conditional jumps to be
always taken, etc.

The issue here is that __reg_bound_offset32()'s implementation from
commit 581738a6 ("bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32
instructions") makes an incorrect range assumption:

  static void __reg_bound_offset32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
  {
        u64 mask = 0xffffFFFF;
        struct tnum range = tnum_range(reg->umin_value & mask,
                                       reg->umax_value & mask);
        struct tnum lo32 = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4);
        struct tnum hi32 = tnum_lshift(tnum_rshift(reg->var_off, 32), 32);

        reg->var_off = tnum_or(hi32, tnum_intersect(lo32, range));
  }

In the above walk-through example, __reg_bound_offset32() as-is chose
a range after masking with 0xffffffff of [0x0,0x0] since umin:0x2000000000
and umax:0x4000000000 and therefore the lo32 part was clamped to 0x0 as
well. However, in the umin:0x2000000000 and umax:0x4000000000 range above
we'd end up with an actual possible interval of [0x0,0xffffffff] for u32
space instead.

In case of the original reproducer, the situation looked as follows at
insn 5 for r0:

  [...]
  5: R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
                               0x30303030           0x13030302f
  5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
   R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x30303020; 0x10000001f)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
                             0x30303030           0x13030302f
  [...]

After the fall-through, we similarly forced the var_off result into
the wrong range [0x30303030,0x3030302f] suggesting later on that fixed
bits must only be of 0x30303020 with 0x10000001f unknowns whereas such
assumption can only be made when both bounds in hi32 range match.

Originally, I was thinking to fix this by moving reg into a temp reg and
use proper coerce_reg_to_size() helper on the temp reg where we can then
based on that define the range tnum for later intersection:

  static void __reg_bound_offset32(struct bpf_reg_state *reg)
  {
        struct bpf_reg_state tmp = *reg;
        struct tnum lo32, hi32, range;

        coerce_reg_to_size(&tmp, 4);
        range = tnum_range(tmp.umin_value, tmp.umax_value);
        lo32 = tnum_cast(reg->var_off, 4);
        hi32 = tnum_lshift(tnum_rshift(reg->var_off, 32), 32);
        reg->var_off = tnum_or(hi32, tnum_intersect(lo32, range));
  }

In the case of the concrete example, this gives us a more conservative unknown
section. Thus, after knowing r1 <= 0x4000000000 and r1 >= 0x2000000000 and
                             w1 <= 0x400        and w1 >= 0x200:

  max: 0b100000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x4000000000
  var: 0b111111111111111111111111111111111111111 / 0x7fffffffff
  min: 0b010000000000000000000000000000000000000 / 0x2000000000

However, above new __reg_bound_offset32() has no effect on refining the
knowledge of the register contents. Meaning, if the bounds in hi32 range
mismatch we'll get the identity function given the range reg spans
[0x0,0xffffffff] and we cast var_off into lo32 only to later on binary
or it again with the hi32.

Likewise, if the bounds in hi32 range match, then we mask both bounds
with 0xffffffff, use the resulting umin/umax for the range to later
intersect the lo32 with it. However, _prior_ called __reg_bound_offset()
did already such intersection on the full reg and we therefore would only
repeat the same operation on the lo32 part twice.

Given this has no effect and the original commit had false assumptions,
this patch reverts the code entirely which is also more straight forward
for stable trees: apparently 581738a6 got auto-selected by Sasha's
ML system and misclassified as a fix, so it got sucked into v5.4 where
it should never have landed. A revert is low-risk also from a user PoV
since it requires a recent kernel and llc to opt-into -mcpu=v3 BPF CPU
to generate jmp32 instructions. A proper bounds refinement would need a
significantly more complex approach which is currently being worked, but
no stable material [0]. Hence revert is best option for stable. After the
revert, the original reported program gets rejected as follows:

  1: (7f) r0 >>= r0
  2: (14) w0 -= 808464432
  3: (07) r0 += 808464432
  4: (b7) r1 = 808464432
  5: (de) if w1 s<= w0 goto pc+0
   R0_w=invP(id=0,umin_value=808464432,umax_value=5103431727,var_off=(0x0; 0x1ffffffff)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  6: (07) r0 += -2144337872
  7: (14) w0 -= -1607454672
  8: (25) if r0 > 0x30303030 goto pc+0
   R0_w=invP(id=0,umax_value=808464432,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fffffff)) R1_w=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  9: (76) if w0 s>= 0x303030 goto pc+2
   R0=invP(id=0,umax_value=3158063,var_off=(0x0; 0x3fffff)) R1=invP808464432 R10=fp0
  10: (30) r0 = *(u8 *)skb[808464432]
  BPF_LD_[ABS|IND] uses reserved fields
  processed 11 insns (limit 1000000) [...]

  [0] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/158507130343.15666.8018068546764556975.stgit@john-Precision-5820-Tower/T/



Fixes: 581738a6 ("bpf: Provide better register bounds after jmp32 instructions")
Reported-by: default avatarAnatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20200330160324.15259-2-daniel@iogearbox.net
      f2d67fec
    • Sven Schnelle's avatar
      seccomp: Add missing compat_ioctl for notify · 3db81afd
      Sven Schnelle authored 
      
Executing the seccomp_bpf testsuite under a 64-bit kernel with 32-bit
userland (both s390 and x86) doesn't work because there's no compat_ioctl
handler defined. Add the handler.

Signed-off-by: default avatarSven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Fixes: 6a21cc50 ("seccomp: add a return code to trap to userspace")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200310123332.42255-1-svens@linux.ibm.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
      3db81afd
  13. Mar 29, 2020
  15. Mar 28, 2020