- Jan 14, 2025
-
-
commit aa52c54da40d9eee3ba87c05cdcb0cd07c04fa13 upstream. We got a report that adding a fanotify filsystem watch prevents tail -f from receiving events. Reproducer: 1. Create 3 windows / login sessions. Become root in each session. 2. Choose a mounted filesystem that is pretty quiet; I picked /boot. 3. In the first window, run: fsnotifywait -S -m /boot 4. In the second window, run: echo data >> /boot/foo 5. In the third window, run: tail -f /boot/foo 6. Go back to the second window and run: echo more data >> /boot/foo 7. Observe that the tail command doesn't show the new data. 8. In the first window, hit control-C to interrupt fsnotifywait. 9. In the second window, run: echo still more data >> /boot/foo 10. Observe that the tail command in the third window has now printed the missing data. When stracing tail, we observed that when fanotify filesystem mark is set, tail does get the inotify event, but the event is receieved with the filename: read(4, "\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\20\0\0\0foo\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 50) = 32 This is unexpected, because tail is watching the file itself and not its parent and is inconsistent with the inotify event received by tail when fanotify filesystem mark is not set: read(4, "\1\0\0\0\2\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 50) = 16 The inteference between different fsnotify groups was caused by the fact that the mark on the sb requires the filename, so the filename is passed to fsnotify(). Later on, fsnotify_handle_event() tries to take care of not passing the filename to groups (such as inotify) that are interested in the filename only when the parent is watching. But the logic was incorrect for the case that no group is watching the parent, some groups are watching the sb and some watching the inode. Reported-by:
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu> Fixes: 7372e79c ("fanotify: fix logic of reporting name info with watched parent") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.10+ Signed-off-by:
Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Signed-off-by:
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
-
- Sep 17, 2024
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
[ Upstream commit 172e422f ] In some setups directories can have many (usually negative) dentries. Hence __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() function can take a significant amount of time. Since the bulk of this function happens under inode->i_lock this causes a significant contention on the lock when we remove the watch from the directory as the __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() call from fsnotify_recalc_mask() races with __fsnotify_update_child_dentry_flags() calls from __fsnotify_parent() happening on children. This can lead upto softlockup reports reported by users. Fix the problem by calling fsnotify_update_children_dentry_flags() to set PARENT_WATCHED flags only when parent starts watching children. When parent stops watching children, clear false positive PARENT_WATCHED flags lazily in __fsnotify_parent() for each accessed child. Suggested-by:
Stephen Brennan <stephen.s.brennan@oracle.com> Signed-off-by:
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
-
- Aug 17, 2023
-
-
[ Upstream commit 69562eb0 ] Hopefully, nobody is trying to abuse mount/sb marks for watching all anonymous pipes/inodes. I cannot think of a good reason to allow this - it looks like an oversight that dated back to the original fanotify API. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20230628101132.kvchg544mczxv2pm@quack3/ Fixes: 0ff21db9 ("fanotify: hooks the fanotify_mark syscall to the vfsmount code") Signed-off-by:
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
-
- May 17, 2023
-
-
Jan Kara authored
commit c915d8f5 upstream. When inotify_freeing_mark() races with inotify_handle_inode_event() it can happen that inotify_handle_inode_event() sees that i_mark->wd got already reset to -1 and reports this value to userspace which can confuse the inotify listener. Avoid the problem by validating that wd is sensible (and pretend the mark got removed before the event got generated otherwise). CC: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 7e790dd5 ("inotify: fix error paths in inotify_update_watch") Message-Id: <20230424163219.9250-1-jack@suse.cz> Reported-by:
<syzbot+4a06d4373fd52f0b2f9c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Reviewed-by:
-
- Sep 26, 2022
-
-
Gaosheng Cui authored
All uses of fanotify_event_has_path() have been removed since commit 9c61f3b5 ("fanotify: break up fanotify_alloc_event()"), now it is useless, so remove it. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220926023018.1505270-1-cuigaosheng1@huawei.com Signed-off-by:
Gaosheng Cui <cuigaosheng1@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Sep 09, 2022
-
-
Gaosheng Cui authored
fsnotify_alloc_event_holder() and fsnotify_destroy_event_holder() has been removed since commit 7053aee2 ("fsnotify: do not share events between notification groups"), so remove it. Reviewed-by:
Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Sep 01, 2022
-
-
Al Viro authored
Reviewed-by:
Matthew Bobrowski <repnop@google.com> Reviewed-by:
Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- Jul 26, 2022
-
-
Xin Gao authored
The double `if' is duplicated in line 104, remove one. Signed-off-by:
Xin Gao <gaoxin@cdjrlc.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Jul 01, 2022
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
This flag is a new way to configure ignore mask which allows adding and removing the event flags FAN_ONDIR and FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD in ignore mask. The legacy FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK flag would always ignore events on directories and would ignore events on children depending on whether the FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD flag was set in the (non ignored) mask. FAN_MARK_IGNORE can be used to ignore events on children without setting FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD in the mark's mask and will not ignore events on directories unconditionally, only when FAN_ONDIR is set in ignore mask. The new behavior is non-downgradable. After calling fanotify_mark() with FAN_MARK_IGNORE once, calling fanotify_mark() with FAN_MARK_IGNORED_MASK on the same object will return EEXIST error. Setting the event flags with FAN_MARK_IGNORE on a non-dir inode mark has no meaning and will return ENOTDIR error. The meaning of FAN_MARK_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY is preserved with the new FAN_MARK_IGNORE flag, but with a few semantic differences: 1. FAN_MARK_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY is required for filesystem and mount marks and on an inode mark on a directory. Omitting this flag will return EINVAL or EISDIR error. 2. An ignore mask on a non-directory inode that survives modify could never be downgraded to an ignore mask that does not survive modify. With new FAN_MARK_IGNORE semantics we make that rule explicit - trying to update a surviving ignore mask without the flag FAN_MARK_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY will return EEXIST error. The conveniene macro FAN_MARK_IGNORE_SURV is added for (FAN_MARK_IGNORE | FAN_MARK_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY), because the common case should use short constant names. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629144210.2983229-4-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Create helper fanotify_may_update_existing_mark() for checking for conflicts between existing mark flags and fanotify_mark() flags. Use variable mark_cmd to make the checks for mark command bits cleaner. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629144210.2983229-3-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Setting flags FAN_ONDIR FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD in ignore mask has no effect. The FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD flag in mask implicitly applies to ignore mask and ignore mask is always implicitly applied to events on directories. Define a mark flag that replaces this legacy behavior with logic of applying the ignore mask according to event flags in ignore mask. Implement the new logic to prepare for supporting an ignore mask that ignores events on children and ignore mask that does not ignore events on directories. To emphasize the change in terminology, also rename ignored_mask mark member to ignore_mask and use accessors to get only the effective ignored events or the ignored events and flags. This change in terminology finally aligns with the "ignore mask" language in man pages and in most of the comments. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220629144210.2983229-2-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Oliver Ford authored
Correct spelling in comment. Signed-off-by:
Oliver Ford <ojford@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Jun 28, 2022
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Commit ceaf69f8 ("fanotify: do not allow setting dirent events in mask of non-dir") added restrictions about setting dirent events in the mask of a non-dir inode mark, which does not make any sense. For backward compatibility, these restictions were added only to new (v5.17+) APIs. It also does not make any sense to set the flags FAN_EVENT_ON_CHILD or FAN_ONDIR in the mask of a non-dir inode. Add these flags to the dir-only restriction of the new APIs as well. Move the check of the dir-only flags for new APIs into the helper fanotify_events_supported(), which is only called for FAN_MARK_ADD, because there is no need to error on an attempt to remove the dir-only flags from non-dir inode. Fixes: ceaf69f8 ("fanotify: do not allow setting dirent events in mask of non-dir") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220627113224.kr2725conevh53u4@quack3.lan/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220627174719.2838175-1-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
- May 23, 2022
-
-
Vasily Averin authored
Fixes sparce warnings: fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:267:63: sparse: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:1351:28: sparse: warning: restricted fmode_t degrades to integer FMODE_NONTIFY have bitwise fmode_t type and requires __force attribute for any casts. Signed-off-by:
Vasily Averin <vvs@openvz.org> Reviewed-by:
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by:
-
- May 18, 2022
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
The logic for handling events on child in groups that have a mark on the parent inode, but without FS_EVENT_ON_CHILD flag in the mask is duplicated in several places and inconsistent. Move the logic into the preparation of mark type iterator, so that the parent mark type will be excluded from all mark type iterations in that case. This results in several subtle changes of behavior, hopefully all desired changes of behavior, for example: - Group A has a mount mark with FS_MODIFY in mask - Group A has a mark with ignore mask that does not survive FS_MODIFY and does not watch children on directory D. - Group B has a mark with FS_MODIFY in mask that does watch children on directory D. - FS_MODIFY event on file D/foo should not clear the ignore mask of group A, but before this change it does And if group A ignore mask was set to survive FS_MODIFY: - FS_MODIFY event on file D/foo should be reported to group A on account of the mount mark, but before this change it is wrongly ignored Fixes: 2f02fd3f ("fanotify: fix ignore mask logic for events on child and on dir") Reported-by:
Jan Kara <jack@suse.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220314113337.j7slrb5srxukztje@quack3.lan/ Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
fsnotify_foreach_iter_mark_type() is used to reduce boilerplate code of iterating all marks of a specific group interested in an event by consulting the iterator report_mask. Use an open coded version of that iterator in fsnotify_iter_next() that collects all marks of the current iteration group without consulting the iterator report_mask. At the moment, the two iterator variants are the same, but this decoupling will allow us to exclude some of the group's marks from reporting the event, for example for event on child and inode marks on parent did not request to watch events on children. Fixes: 2f02fd3f ("fanotify: fix ignore mask logic for events on child and on dir") Reported-by:
-
- May 09, 2022
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Dirent events (create/delete/move) are only reported on watched directory inodes, but in fanotify as well as in legacy inotify, it was always allowed to set them on non-dir inode, which does not result in any meaningful outcome. Until kernel v5.17, dirent events in fanotify also differed from events "on child" (e.g. FAN_OPEN) in the information provided in the event. For example, FAN_OPEN could be set in the mask of a non-dir or the mask of its parent and event would report the fid of the child regardless of the marked object. By contrast, FAN_DELETE is not reported if the child is marked and the child fid was not reported in the events. Since kernel v5.17, with fanotify group flag FAN_REPORT_TARGET_FID, the fid of the child is reported with dirent events, like events "on child", which may create confusion for users expecting the same behavior as events "on child" when setting events in the mask on a child. The desired semantics of setting dirent events in the mask of a child are not clear, so for now, deny this action for a group initialized with flag FAN_REPORT_TARGET_FID and for the new event FAN_RENAME. We may relax this restriction in the future if we decide on the semantics and implement them. Fixes: d61fd650 ("fanotify: introduce group flag FAN_REPORT_TARGET_FID") Fixes: 8cc3b1cc ("fanotify: wire up FAN_RENAME event") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/20220505133057.zm5t6vumc4xdcnsg@quack3.lan/ Signed-off-by:
-
- Apr 25, 2022
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Now that the direct reclaim path is handled we can enable evictable inode marks. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-17-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Direct reclaim from fanotify mark allocation context may try to evict inodes with evictable marks of the same group and hit this deadlock: [<0>] fsnotify_destroy_mark+0x1f/0x3a [<0>] fsnotify_destroy_marks+0x71/0xd9 [<0>] __destroy_inode+0x24/0x7e [<0>] destroy_inode+0x2c/0x67 [<0>] dispose_list+0x49/0x68 [<0>] prune_icache_sb+0x5b/0x79 [<0>] super_cache_scan+0x11c/0x16f [<0>] shrink_slab.constprop.0+0x23e/0x40f [<0>] shrink_node+0x218/0x3e7 [<0>] do_try_to_free_pages+0x12a/0x2d2 [<0>] try_to_free_pages+0x166/0x242 [<0>] __alloc_pages_slowpath.constprop.0+0x30c/0x903 [<0>] __alloc_pages+0xeb/0x1c7 [<0>] cache_grow_begin+0x6f/0x31e [<0>] fallback_alloc+0xe0/0x12d [<0>] ____cache_alloc_node+0x15a/0x17e [<0>] kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0xa1/0x143 [<0>] fanotify_add_mark+0xd5/0x2b2 [<0>] do_fanotify_mark+0x566/0x5eb [<0>] __x64_sys_fanotify_mark+0x21/0x24 [<0>] do_syscall_64+0x6d/0x80 [<0>] entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xae Set the FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS flag to prevent going into direct reclaim from allocations under fanotify group lock and use the safe group lock helpers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-16-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
When an inode mark is created with flag FAN_MARK_EVICTABLE, it will not pin the marked inode to inode cache, so when inode is evicted from cache due to memory pressure, the mark will be lost. When an inode mark with flag FAN_MARK_EVICATBLE is updated without using this flag, the marked inode is pinned to inode cache. When an inode mark is updated with flag FAN_MARK_EVICTABLE but an existing mark already has the inode pinned, the mark update fails with error EEXIST. Evictable inode marks can be used to setup inode marks with ignored mask to suppress events from uninteresting files or directories in a lazy manner, upon receiving the first event, without having to iterate all the uninteresting files or directories before hand. The evictbale inode mark feature allows performing this lazy marks setup without exhausting the system memory with pinned inodes. This change does not enable the feature yet. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/CAOQ4uxiRDpuS=2uA6+ZUM7yG9vVU-u212tkunBmSnP_u=mkv=Q@mail.gmail.com/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-15-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Handle FAN_MARK_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag change in a helper that is called after updating the mark mask. Replace the added and removed return values and help variables with bool recalc return values and help variable, which makes the code a bit easier to follow. Rename flags argument to fan_flags to emphasize the difference from mark->flags. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-14-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
To translate from fsnotify mark flags to user visible flags. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-13-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
fsnotify_add_mark() and variants implicitly take a reference on inode when attaching a mark to an inode. Make that behavior opt-out with the mark flag FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_NO_IREF. Instead of taking the inode reference when attaching connector to inode and dropping the inode reference when detaching connector from inode, take the inode reference on attach of the first mark that wants to hold an inode reference and drop the inode reference on detach of the last mark that wants to hold an inode reference. Backends can "upgrade" an existing mark to take an inode reference, but cannot "downgrade" a mark with inode reference to release the refernce. This leaves the choice to the backend whether or not to pin the inode when adding an inode mark. This is intended to be used when adding a mark with ignored mask that is used for optimization in cases where group can afford getting unneeded events and reinstate the mark with ignored mask when inode is accessed again after being evicted. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-12-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Before commit 9542e6a6 ("nfsd: Containerise filecache laundrette") nfsd would close open files in direct reclaim context. There is no guarantee that others memory shrinkers don't do the same and no guarantee that future shrinkers won't do that. For example, if overlayfs implements inode cache of fscache would keep open files to cached objects, inode shrinkers could end up closing open files to underlying fs. Direct reclaim from dnotify mark allocation context may try to close open files that have dnotify marks of the same group and hit a deadlock on mark_mutex. Set the FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS flag to prevent going into direct reclaim from allocations under dnotify group lock and use the safe group lock helpers. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-11-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
inotify inode marks pin the inode so there is no need to set the FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS flag. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-8-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Create helpers to take and release the group mark_mutex lock. Define a flag FSNOTIFY_GROUP_NOFS in fsnotify_group that determines if the mark_mutex lock is fs reclaim safe or not. If not safe, the lock helpers take the lock and disable direct fs reclaim. In that case we annotate the mutex with a different lockdep class to express to lockdep that an allocation of mark of an fs reclaim safe group may take the group lock of another "NOFS" group to evict inodes. For now, converted only the callers in common code and no backend defines the NOFS flag. It is intended to be set by fanotify for evictable marks support. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-7-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Instead of passing the allow_dups argument to fsnotify_add_mark() as an argument, define the group flag FSNOTIFY_GROUP_DUPS to express the allow_dups behavior and set this behavior at group creation time for all calls of fsnotify_add_mark(). Rename the allow_dups argument to generic add_flags argument for future use. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-6-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Add flags argument to fsnotify_alloc_group(), define and use the flag FSNOTIFY_GROUP_USER in inotify and fanotify instead of the helper fsnotify_alloc_user_group() to indicate user allocation. Although the flag FSNOTIFY_GROUP_USER is currently not used after group allocation, we store the flags argument in the group struct for future use of other group flags. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-5-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
Commit 6960b0d9 ("fsnotify: change locking order") changed some of the mark_mutex locks in direct reclaim path to use: mutex_lock_nested(&group->mark_mutex, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING); This change is explained: "...It uses nested locking to avoid deadlock in case we do the final iput() on an inode which still holds marks and thus would take the mutex again when calling fsnotify_inode_delete() in destroy_inode()." The problem is that the mutex_lock_nested() is not a nested lock at all. In fact, it has the opposite effect of preventing lockdep from warning about a very possible deadlock. Due to these wrong annotations, a deadlock that was introduced with nfsd filecache in kernel v5.4 went unnoticed in v5.4.y for over two years until it was reported recently by Khazhismel Kumykov, only to find out that the deadlock was already fixed in kernel v5.5. Fix the wrong lockdep annotations. Cc: Khazhismel Kumykov <khazhy@google.com> Fixes: 6960b0d9 ("fsnotify: change locking order") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220321112310.vpr7oxro2xkz5llh@quack3.lan/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-4-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
The inotify control flags in the mark mask (e.g. FS_IN_ONE_SHOT) are not relevant to object interest mask, so move them to the mark flags. This frees up some bits in the object interest mask. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-3-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
The inotify mask flags IN_ONESHOT and IN_EXCL_UNLINK are not "internal to kernel" and should be exposed in procfs fdinfo so CRIU can restore them. Fixes: 69335996 ("inotify: hide internal kernel bits from fdinfo") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220422120327.3459282-2-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
- Mar 14, 2022
-
-
Bang Li authored
iput() has already judged the incoming parameter, so there is no need to repeat the judgment here. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220311151240.62045-1-libang.linuxer@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
Bang Li <libang.linuxer@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Feb 24, 2022
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
fsnotify() treats FS_MODIFY events specially - it does not skip them even if the FS_MODIFY event does not apear in the object's fsnotify mask. This is because send_to_group() checks if FS_MODIFY needs to clear ignored mask of marks. The common case is that an object does not have any mark with ignored mask and in particular, that it does not have a mark with ignored mask and without the FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag. Set FS_MODIFY in object's fsnotify mask during fsnotify_recalc_mask() if object has a mark with an ignored mask and without the FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag and remove the special treatment of FS_MODIFY in fsnotify(), so that FS_MODIFY events could be optimized in the common case. Call fsnotify_recalc_mask() from fanotify after adding or removing an ignored mask from a mark without FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY or when adding the FSNOTIFY_MARK_FLAG_IGNORED_SURV_MODIFY flag to a mark with ignored mask (the flag cannot be removed by fanotify uapi). Performance results for doing 10000000 write(2)s to tmpfs: vanilla patched without notification mark 25.486+-1.054 24.965+-0.244 with notification mark 30.111+-0.139 26.891+-1.355 So we can see the overhead of notification subsystem has been drastically reduced. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220223151438.790268-3-amir73il@gmail.com Suggested-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
fsnotify_parent() does not consider the parent's mark at all unless the parent inode shows interest in events on children and in the specific event. So unless parent added an event to both its mark mask and ignored mask, the event will not be ignored. Fix this by declaring the interest of an object in an event when the event is in either a mark mask or ignored mask. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220223151438.790268-2-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
- Feb 01, 2022
-
-
Dan Carpenter authored
This code calls fd_install() which gives the userspace access to the fd. Then if copy_info_records_to_user() fails it calls put_unused_fd(fd) but that will not release it and leads to a stale entry in the file descriptor table. Generally you can't trust the fd after a call to fd_install(). The fix is to delay the fd_install() until everything else has succeeded. Fortunately it requires CAP_SYS_ADMIN to reach this code so the security impact is less. Fixes: f644bc44 ("fanotify: fix copy_event_to_user() fid error clean up") Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220128195656.GA26981@kili Signed-off-by:
Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com> Reviewed-by:
Mathias Krause <minipli@grsecurity.net> Signed-off-by:
-
- Jan 22, 2022
-
-
Xiaoming Ni authored
There is no need to user boiler plate code to specify a set of base directories we're going to stuff sysctls under. Simplify this by using register_sysctl() and specifying the directory path directly. Move inotify_user sysctl to inotify_user.c while at it to remove clutter from kernel/sysctl.c. [mcgrof@kernel.org: remember to register fanotify_table] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/YZ5A6iWLb0h3N3RC@bombadil.infradead.org [mcgrof@kernel.org: update commit log to reflect new path we decided to take] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211123202422.819032-7-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
Xiaoming Ni <nixiaoming@huawei.com> Signed-off-by:
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org> Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Amir Goldstein <amir73il@gmail.com> Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Cc: Antti Palosaari <crope@iki.fi> Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org> Cc: Benjamin LaHaise <bcrl@kvack.org> Cc: Clemens Ladisch <clemens@ladisch.de> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> Cc: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@inria.fr> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Cc: Lukas Middendorf <kernel@tuxforce.de> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark@fasheh.com> Cc: Paul Turner <pjt@google.com> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com> Cc: Phillip Potter <phil@philpotter.co.uk> Cc: Qing Wang <wangqing@vivo.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Sebastian Reichel <sre@kernel.org> Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org> Cc: Stephen Kitt <steve@sk2.org> Cc: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp> Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com> Cc: James E.J. Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de> Cc: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org> Cc: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com> Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu> Signed-off-by:
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by:
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
Xiaoming Ni authored
The kernel/sysctl.c is a kitchen sink where everyone leaves their dirty dishes, this makes it very difficult to maintain. To help with this maintenance let's start by moving sysctls to places where they actually belong. The proc sysctl maintainers do not want to know what sysctl knobs you wish to add for your own piece of code, we just care about the core logic. So move dnotify sysctls to dnotify.c and use the new register_sysctl_init() to register the sysctl interface. [mcgrof@kernel.org: adjust the commit log to justify the move] Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20211123202347.818157-10-mcgrof@kernel.org Signed-off-by:
-
- Jan 20, 2022
-
-
Yang Li authored
The code that uses the pointer info has been removed in 7326e382 ("fanotify: report old and/or new parent+name in FAN_RENAME event"). and fanotify_event_info() doesn't change 'event', so the declaration and assignment of info can be removed. Eliminate the following clang warning: fs/notify/fanotify/fanotify_user.c:161:24: warning: variable ‘info’ set but not used Reported-by:
Abaci Robot <abaci@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
Yang Li <yang.lee@linux.alibaba.com> Signed-off-by:
-
- Dec 15, 2021
-
-
Amir Goldstein authored
FAN_RENAME is the successor of FAN_MOVED_FROM and FAN_MOVED_TO and can be used to get the old and new parent+name information in a single event. FAN_MOVED_FROM and FAN_MOVED_TO are still supported for backward compatibility, but it makes little sense to use them together with FAN_RENAME in the same group. FAN_RENAME uses special info type records to report the old and new parent+name, so reporting only old and new parent id is less useful and was not implemented. Therefore, FAN_REANAME requires a group with flag FAN_REPORT_NAME. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129201537.1932819-12-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
Amir Goldstein authored
In the special case of FAN_RENAME event, we report old or new or both old and new parent+name. A single info record will be reported if either the old or new dir is watched and two records will be reported if both old and new dir (or their filesystem) are watched. The old and new parent+name are reported using new info record types FAN_EVENT_INFO_TYPE_{OLD,NEW}_DFID_NAME, so if a single info record is reported, it is clear to the application, to which dir entry the fid+name info is referring to. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211129201537.1932819-11-amir73il@gmail.com Signed-off-by:
-
